Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECLCX vs RGEBX
ECLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECLCX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Growth C
Price$25.81
Change-$6.67 (-20.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ECLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLCX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ECLCX (439M). ECLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECLCX (23 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECLCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECLCX (18.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECLCX: RGEBX (250) vs ECLCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. ECLCX (-10.51). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. ECLCX (-12.66).
| ECLCX | RGEBX | ECLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 1.08 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.235 | -1.057 | 212% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.51 | 1.80 | -584% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.83 | 41.63 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.66 | 9.88 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.91 | 110.02 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement