Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECLCX vs RGACX
ECLCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECLCX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Growth C
Price$25.81
Change-$6.67 (-20.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.57M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$76.64
Change-$9.33 (-10.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ECLCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECLCX vs. RGACX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECLCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ECLCX (439M). ECLCX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECLCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECLCX (23 years) vs RGACX (24 years). ECLCX (1.79) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECLCX (18.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECLCX: RGACX (250) vs ECLCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.06 vs. ECLCX (-10.51). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 11.01 vs. ECLCX (-12.66).
| ECLCX | RGACX | ECLCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.93 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.79 | 0.93 | 192% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.235 | -1.046 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 439M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.51 | 2.06 | -509% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.83 | 42.58 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.66 | 11.01 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.91 | 113.97 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement