Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBGX
ECIFX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBGX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.71
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$37.49
Change-$0.08 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
ECIFX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a Buy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. ECIFX (1.07B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBGX (2.13) vs ECIFX (0.50). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBGX (16 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBGX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.36 vs. ECIFX (6.05). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. ECIFX (24.57).
| ECIFX | RLBGX | ECIFX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.25 | 688% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.25 | 688% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.371 | 9.990 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 256B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 2.13 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.05 | 8.36 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.66 | 30.72 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.57 | 40.09 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.76 | 69.65 | 79% |