Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBGX
ECIFX vs RLBGX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBGX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.92
Change-$0.14 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
American Funds American Balanced R6
Price$39.11
Change-$0.48 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets268.67B
ECIFX vs RLBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBGX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a StrongBuy and RLBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBGX has more cash in the bank: 269B vs. ECIFX (1.09B). RLBGX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBGX (2.01) vs ECIFX (0.44). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBGX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBGX (17 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBGX (0.25). RLBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBGX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.35 vs. ECIFX (4.57). RLBGX return over 5 years is better than : 43.37 vs. ECIFX (24.62).
| ECIFX | RLBGX | ECIFX / RLBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.25 | 688% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.25 | 688% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.442 | 16.570 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 269B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 2.01 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 10.35 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.09 | 44.95 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.62 | 43.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.56 | 81.84 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement