Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.08
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.37B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 265B vs. ECIFX (1.09B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.00) vs ECIFX (0.44). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.05 vs. ECIFX (3.40). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.90 vs. ECIFX (23.91).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.074 | 14.890 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 265B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 2.00 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.40 | 9.05 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.41 | 51.85 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.91 | 43.90 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.48 | 78.80 | 75% |