Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECIFX vs RLBFX
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ECIFX vs RLBFX
Eaton Vance Balanced C
Price$12.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
ECIFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECIFX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIFX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. ECIFX (1.07B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ECIFX: RLBFX (2.05) vs ECIFX (0.49). ECIFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ECIFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ECIFX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. ECIFX (5.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECIFX: RLBFX (250) vs ECIFX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. ECIFX (6.82). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. ECIFX (25.27).
| ECIFX | RLBFX | ECIFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.29 | 593% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.878 | 11.562 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 259B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.05 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 10.28 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.48 | 40.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.27 | 41.46 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.13 | 78.40 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement