ECIA
Price
$0.28
Change
+$0.07 (+33.33%)
Updated
Oct 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.73M
SEMHF
Price
$54.20
Change
-$2.13 (-3.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
62.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECIA vs SEMHF

Header iconECIA vs SEMHF Comparison
Open Charts ECIA vs SEMHFBanner chart's image
Encision
Price$0.28
Change+$0.07 (+33.33%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization4.73M
Siemens Healthineers AG
Price$54.20
Change-$2.13 (-3.78%)
Volume$478
Capitalization62.19B
ECIA vs SEMHF Comparison Chart in %
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECIA vs. SEMHF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIA is a Hold and SEMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (ECIA: $0.28 vs. SEMHF: $54.20)
Brand notoriety: ECIA and SEMHF are both not notable
ECIA represents the Pharmaceuticals: Other, while SEMHF is part of the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECIA: 23% vs. SEMHF: 59%
Market capitalization -- ECIA: $4.73M vs. SEMHF: $62.19B
ECIA [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $4.73M. SEMHF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $62.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $159.93B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $223.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $11.18B. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEMHF is a better buy in the long-term than ECIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECIA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEMHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECIA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SEMHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SEMHF is a better buy in the short-term than ECIA.

Price Growth

ECIA (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -22.43% price change this week, while SEMHF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -2.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-0.29% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.22% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEMHF($62.2B) has a higher market cap than ECIA($4.73M). SEMHF YTD gains are higher at: 2.438 vs. ECIA (-37.778). SEMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.68B vs. ECIA (-143.16K). SEMHF has more cash in the bank: 2.77B vs. ECIA (47.9K). ECIA has less debt than SEMHF: ECIA (1.84M) vs SEMHF (735M). SEMHF has higher revenues than ECIA: SEMHF (23.4B) vs ECIA (6.53M).
ECIASEMHFECIA / SEMHF
Capitalization4.73M62.2B0%
EBITDA-143.16K4.68B-0%
Gain YTD-37.7782.438-1,549%
P/E RatioN/A24.11-
Revenue6.53M23.4B0%
Total Cash47.9K2.77B0%
Total Debt1.84M735M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECIA vs SEMHF: Fundamental Ratings
ECIA
SEMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2366
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10077
SMR RATING
1..100
9562
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8754
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
668
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEMHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (68). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (100). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (95). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (87). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

ECIA's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEMHF (68). This means that ECIA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECIASEMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UHS204.560.32
+0.16%
Universal Health Services
WSBK9.51-0.09
-0.94%
Winchester Bancorp Inc
AMBP3.75-0.04
-1.06%
Ardagh Metal Packaging SA
FULC8.99-0.30
-3.23%
Fulcrum Therapeutics
ELAB6.89-0.89
-11.44%
PMGC Holdings Inc

ECIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and RDNT have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and RDNT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECIA
1D Price
Change %
ECIA100%
N/A
RDNT - ECIA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
QTRX - ECIA
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
SEMHF - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.79%
HBIO - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.18%
BFLY - ECIA
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.36%
More

SEMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEMHF and ECIA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEMHF and ECIA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEMHF
1D Price
Change %
SEMHF100%
-3.79%
ECIA - SEMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBY - SEMHF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
SARTF - SEMHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKHCF - SEMHF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAUHY - SEMHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More