ECIA
Price
$0.37
Change
+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.41M
SEMHF
Price
$54.72
Change
-$2.18 (-3.83%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
65B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECIA vs SEMHF

Header iconECIA vs SEMHF Comparison
Open Charts ECIA vs SEMHFBanner chart's image
Encision
Price$0.37
Change+$0.03 (+8.82%)
Volume$400
Capitalization5.41M
Siemens Healthineers AG
Price$54.72
Change-$2.18 (-3.83%)
Volume$836
Capitalization65B
ECIA vs SEMHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECIA vs. SEMHF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECIA is a Buy and SEMHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ECIA: $0.37 vs. SEMHF: $54.72)
Brand notoriety: ECIA and SEMHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECIA: 30% vs. SEMHF: 19%
Market capitalization -- ECIA: $5.41M vs. SEMHF: $65B
ECIA [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $5.41M. SEMHF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECIA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEMHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ECIA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEMHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEMHF is a better buy in the long-term than ECIA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECIA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEMHF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECIA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SEMHF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ECIA is a better buy in the short-term than SEMHF.

Price Growth

ECIA (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SEMHF (@Medical Specialties) price change was -0.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (+3.05% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEMHF($65B) has a higher market cap than ECIA($5.41M). ECIA has higher P/E ratio than SEMHF: ECIA (47.17) vs SEMHF (38.61). SEMHF YTD gains are higher at: 3.419 vs. ECIA (-18.667). SEMHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.79B vs. ECIA (-529.03K). SEMHF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. ECIA (120K). ECIA has less debt than SEMHF: ECIA (976K) vs SEMHF (654M). SEMHF has higher revenues than ECIA: SEMHF (21.6B) vs ECIA (7.15M).
ECIASEMHFECIA / SEMHF
Capitalization5.41M65B0%
EBITDA-529.03K3.79B-0%
Gain YTD-18.6673.419-546%
P/E Ratio47.1738.61122%
Revenue7.15M21.6B0%
Total Cash120K1.75B0%
Total Debt976K654M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ECIA vs SEMHF: Fundamental Ratings
ECIA
SEMHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10084
SMR RATING
1..100
9565
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
582
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SEMHF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ECIA (72). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (100). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (95). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

SEMHF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as ECIA (63). This means that SEMHF’s stock grew similarly to ECIA’s over the last 12 months.

ECIA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SEMHF (82). This means that ECIA’s stock grew significantly faster than SEMHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECIASEMHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECIA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEMHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
R182.605.47
+3.09%
Ryder System
USAU11.510.25
+2.22%
US Gold Corp
SLB35.470.23
+0.65%
Schlumberger Limited
STBA37.67-0.28
-0.72%
S&T Bancorp
EDIT3.15-0.11
-3.37%
Editas Medicine

ECIA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ECIA and CVRX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECIA and CVRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECIA
1D Price
Change %
ECIA100%
N/A
CVRX - ECIA
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
SINT - ECIA
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
SEMHF - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.83%
CZMWF - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMCI - ECIA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.55%
More

SEMHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SEMHF and ECIA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SEMHF and ECIA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEMHF
1D Price
Change %
SEMHF100%
-3.83%
ECIA - SEMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSKN - SEMHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.97%
SERA - SEMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSSUY - SEMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRCHF - SEMHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.20%
More