LTM | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECH | LTM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago67% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 5 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago88% | 5 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago87% | 5 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago89% | 6 days ago70% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago85% | 25 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 5 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 5 days ago58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECH has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECH jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LTM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
AFLYY - LTM | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
LUV - LTM | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | +6.14% | ||
VLRS - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
SNCY - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More |