Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECH vs FLAU
ECH vs FLAU Comparison
Open Charts ECH vs FLAU
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
Price$43.88
Change+$1.03 (+2.40%)
Volume$6.66K
Net Assets1.12B
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Price$31.89
Change+$0.37 (+1.17%)
Volume$100
Net Assets72.44M
ECH vs FLAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECH vs. FLAU commentary
Jan 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECH is a Buy and FLAU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECH has more net assets: 1.12B vs. FLAU (72.4M). ECH has a higher annual dividend yield than FLAU: ECH (6.064) vs FLAU (0.298). ECH was incepted earlier than FLAU: ECH (18 years) vs FLAU (8 years). FLAU (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than ECH (0.60). ECH has a higher turnover FLAU (6.07) vs FLAU (6.07).
| ECH | FLAU | ECH / FLAU | |
| Gain YTD | 6.064 | 0.298 | 2,035% |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 72.4M | 1,546% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 667% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 6.07 | 741% |
| Yield | 2.01 | 3.24 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECH | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSMQX | 17.74 | 0.17 | +0.97% |
| Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth Svc | |||
| REREX | 61.05 | 0.54 | +0.89% |
| American Funds EUPAC R4 | |||
| BUIMX | 15.08 | 0.12 | +0.80% |
| Buffalo Mid Cap Growth Inst | |||
| SFNNX | 14.27 | 0.11 | +0.78% |
| Schwab Fundamental Intl Equity Index Fd | |||
| ERBAX | 18.60 | 0.13 | +0.70% |
| Eaton Vance Equity Strategy A | |||
ECH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECH has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECH jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
FLAU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLAU has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLAU jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAU | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| WDS - FLAU | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TPG - FLAU | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| TLX - FLAU | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| NXT - FLAU | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| TLS - FLAU | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||