Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECH vs FLAU
ECH vs FLAU Comparison
Open Charts ECH vs FLAU
iShares MSCI Chile ETF
Price$36.40
Change-$0.31 (-0.84%)
Volume$8.57K
Net Assets950.25M
Franklin FTSE Australia ETF
Price$31.08
Change-$0.08 (-0.26%)
Volume$4K
Net Assets68.09M
ECH vs FLAU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECH vs. FLAU commentary
Nov 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECH is a Buy and FLAU is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECH has more net assets: 950M vs. FLAU (68.1M). ECH has a higher annual dividend yield than FLAU: ECH (49.769) vs FLAU (12.801). ECH was incepted earlier than FLAU: ECH (18 years) vs FLAU (8 years). FLAU (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than ECH (0.60). ECH has a higher turnover FLAU (6.07) vs FLAU (6.07).
| ECH | FLAU | ECH / FLAU | |
| Gain YTD | 49.769 | 12.801 | 389% |
| Net Assets | 950M | 68.1M | 1,395% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.09 | 667% |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 6.07 | 511% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 3.24 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECH | FLAU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 18 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ECH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECH has been closely correlated with LTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECH jumps, then LTM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
FLAU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLAU has been loosely correlated with WDS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLAU jumps, then WDS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLAU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLAU | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| WDS - FLAU | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| TPG - FLAU | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| NXT - FLAU | 26% Poorly correlated | -8.72% | ||
| TLS - FLAU | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.45% | ||
| WOW - FLAU | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||