ECG
Price
$86.60
Change
+$0.94 (+1.10%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
4.42B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$437.07
Change
-$7.13 (-1.61%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
65.17B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ECG vs PWR

Header iconECG vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts ECG vs PWRBanner chart's image
Everus Construction Group
Price$86.60
Change+$0.94 (+1.10%)
Volume$895.02K
Capitalization4.42B
Quanta Services
Price$437.07
Change-$7.13 (-1.61%)
Volume$925.81K
Capitalization65.17B
ECG vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
ECG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECG vs. PWR commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECG is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ECG: $86.60 vs. PWR: $437.07)
Brand notoriety: ECG and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECG: 145% vs. PWR: 96%
Market capitalization -- ECG: $4.42B vs. PWR: $65.17B
ECG [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $4.42B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $65.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ECG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than ECG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ECG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ECG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than ECG.

Price Growth

ECG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.26% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECG is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+2.03% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($65.2B) has a higher market cap than ECG($4.42B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than ECG: PWR (64.75) vs ECG (24.41). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 3.583 vs. ECG (1.216). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.5B vs. ECG (280M). PWR has more cash in the bank: 250M vs. ECG (130M). ECG has less debt than PWR: ECG (370M) vs PWR (6.02B). PWR has higher revenues than ECG: PWR (27.2B) vs ECG (3.5B).
ECGPWRECG / PWR
Capitalization4.42B65.2B7%
EBITDA280M2.5B11%
Gain YTD1.2163.58334%
P/E Ratio24.4164.7538%
Revenue3.5B27.2B13%
Total Cash130M250M52%
Total Debt370M6.02B6%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWR: Fundamental Ratings
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
28
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECGPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ECG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLU217.750.35
+0.16%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® 1500 ValTiltETF
MCHI63.550.03
+0.05%
iShares MSCI China ETF
RMMZ14.70-0.02
-0.14%
RiverNorth Managed Duration Municipal Income Fund II
SROI34.29-0.07
-0.20%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Global Sus Eqs ETF
BDIV23.12-0.06
-0.28%
AAM Brentview Dividend Growth ETF

ECG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECG has been closely correlated with STRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ECG jumps, then STRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECG
1D Price
Change %
ECG100%
+1.10%
STRL - ECG
67%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
FIX - ECG
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
MTZ - ECG
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
PWR - ECG
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
PRIM - ECG
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
-1.61%
MTZ - PWR
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
FIX - PWR
80%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-1.79%
STRL - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
PRIM - PWR
78%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
More