Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.07
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.73M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.64
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.49) vs ECFVX (0.45). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.73 vs. ECFVX (-2.00). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 65.70 vs. ECFVX (40.98).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.62 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.189 | 13.481 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.49 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 6.73 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.90 | 43.42 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.98 | 65.70 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.55 | 111.76 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers