Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFEX
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFEX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.29
Change-$0.25 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.44M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
ECFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ECFVX (237M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFEX (1.46) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFEX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. ECFVX (-4.14). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. ECFVX (28.02).
| ECFVX | RMFEX | ECFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.62 | 281% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.62 | 292% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.342 | 15.396 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.46 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.14 | 7.02 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.42 | 31.78 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | 57.30 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.59 | 101.84 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement