Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.49M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ECFVX (198M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.18) vs ECFVX (0.43). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.05 vs. ECFVX (4.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. ECFVX (24.15).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.713 | 9.696 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.18 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 8.05 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.66 | 28.89 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.15 | 46.17 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.85 | 91.60 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement