Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.07
Change+$0.18 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.73M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.43B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. ECFVX (238M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.24) vs ECFVX (0.45). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.41 vs. ECFVX (-2.00). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.20 vs. ECFVX (40.98).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.189 | 13.245 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 1.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.00 | 6.41 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.90 | 42.10 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.98 | 63.20 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.55 | 103.62 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers