Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMFCX
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMFCX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.77
Change-$0.08 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets198.49M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
ECFVX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ECFVX (198M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMFCX (1.18) vs ECFVX (0.43). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMFCX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. ECFVX (-2.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. ECFVX (26.88).
| ECFVX | RMFCX | ECFVX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 0.91 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.91 | 199% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.277 | 15.500 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 198M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.43 | 1.18 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.59 | 6.27 | -41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 27.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.88 | 52.02 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.86 | 90.44 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers