Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFVX vs RMEBX
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFVX vs RMEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Value Opps C
Price$20.29
Change-$0.25 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.44M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
ECFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFVX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. ECFVX (237M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ECFVX: RMEBX (1.05) vs ECFVX (0.44). ECFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ECFVX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). ECFVX (1.81) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ECFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFVX: RMEBX (250) vs ECFVX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. ECFVX (-4.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. ECFVX (28.02).
| ECFVX | RMEBX | ECFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.07 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.07 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.342 | 13.637 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 237M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.05 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.14 | 5.37 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.42 | 29.45 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.02 | 52.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.59 | 87.37 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement