Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGEBX
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGEBX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$18.49
Change-$7.08 (-27.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ECFGX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ECFGX (117M). ECFGX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGEBX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. ECFGX (-18.94). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. ECFGX (-36.04).
| ECFGX | RGEBX | ECFGX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.08 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 1.08 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.787 | -1.057 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.94 | 1.80 | -1,053% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.93 | 41.63 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.04 | 9.88 | -365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.61 | 110.02 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement