Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGAHX
ECFGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$19.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
ECFGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ECFGX (124M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGAHX (0.44) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGAHX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. ECFGX (-17.59). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.10 vs. ECFGX (-30.30).
| ECFGX | RGAHX | ECFGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.44 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.44 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.736 | 9.123 | -162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.59 | 5.75 | -306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.76 | 65.91 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.30 | 23.10 | -131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.39 | 96.48 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement