Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGAHX
ECFGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$18.49
Change-$7.08 (-27.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets117.06M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$78.44
Change-$9.61 (-10.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
ECFGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ECFGX (117M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGAHX (0.43) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGAHX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. ECFGX (-18.94). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.96 vs. ECFGX (-36.04).
| ECFGX | RGAHX | ECFGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.44 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.44 | 416% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.787 | -1.010 | 276% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.94 | 2.79 | -678% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.93 | 45.40 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.04 | 13.96 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.61 | 119.50 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement