Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGACX
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$24.75
Change-$0.08 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets122.11M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. ECFGX (122M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGACX (0.07) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECFGX (14 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGACX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. ECFGX (9.90). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. ECFGX (-2.86).
| ECFGX | RGACX | ECFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.854 | 14.044 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 122M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.90 | 14.08 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.95 | 41.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.86 | 41.95 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.51 | 83.68 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement