Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECFGX vs RGACX
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ECFGX vs RGACX
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C
Price$25.07
Change+$0.09 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.55M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
ECFGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECFGX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECFGX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ECFGX (124M). RGACX pays higher dividends than ECFGX: RGACX (0.07) vs ECFGX (0.00). ECFGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ECFGX (15 years) vs RGACX (23 years). ECFGX (1.83) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECFGX (23.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECFGX: RGACX (250) vs ECFGX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.01 vs. ECFGX (7.23). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. ECFGX (-5.57).
| ECFGX | RGACX | ECFGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.94 | 191% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.83 | 0.94 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.274 | 17.655 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 124M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.23 | 11.01 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.82 | 70.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.57 | 37.85 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.39 | 96.78 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement