Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$35.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets877.24M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.85
Change-$0.82 (-2.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.13B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a StrongBuy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. ECEAX (877M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.69 vs. ECEAX (5.88). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.73 vs. RGWBX (17.86).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.255 | 1.052 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 877M | 25.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.88 | 10.69 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.62 | 48.42 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.73 | 17.86 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 155.93 | 114.42 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement