Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECEAX vs RGWBX
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts ECEAX vs RGWBX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Eq Aset Allc C
Price$36.91
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets864.73M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$29.40
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.9B
ECEAX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECEAX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECEAX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. ECEAX (865M). ECEAX (0.00) and RGWBX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECEAX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: ECEAX (24 years) vs RGWBX (14 years). ECEAX (2.46) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECEAX: RGWBX (250) vs ECEAX (1000). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.70 vs. ECEAX (9.20). ECEAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.47 vs. RGWBX (31.01).
| ECEAX | RGWBX | ECEAX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.94 | 1.46 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.46 | 1.46 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.428 | 20.789 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 865M | 24.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.20 | 11.70 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.73 | 57.95 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.47 | 31.01 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | 137.36 | 102.10 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement