Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCPX vs RGAHX
ECCPX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs RGAHX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$48.51
Change+$0.47 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.84M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.72
Change+$0.80 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
ECCPX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCPX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCPX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. ECCPX (156M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than ECCPX: RGAHX (0.47) vs ECCPX (0.00). ECCPX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: ECCPX (25 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). ECCPX (1.98) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: RGAHX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.98 vs. ECCPX (4.50). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 54.59 vs. RGAHX (50.13).
| ECCPX | RGAHX | ECCPX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.44 | 450% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.44 | 450% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.950 | 11.275 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156M | 323B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 10.98 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.43 | 60.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.59 | 50.13 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 158.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement