Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCPX vs FFAFX
ECCPX vs FFAFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCPX vs FFAFX
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr C
Price$51.06
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.31M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.36
Change+$0.53 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
ECCPX vs FFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. ECCPX (164M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than ECCPX: FFAFX (0.54) vs ECCPX (0.00). ECCPX was incepted earlier than FFAFX: ECCPX (25 years) vs FFAFX (5 years). ECCPX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ECCPX (8.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCPX: FFAFX (250) vs ECCPX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. ECCPX (3.02). ECCPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.15 vs. FFAFX (34.69).
| ECCPX | FFAFX | ECCPX / FFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.35 | 566% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.35 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.895 | 19.205 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.54 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.02 | 7.34 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.16 | 63.71 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.15 | 34.69 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement