Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs TRCLX
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs TRCLX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.01
Change-$1.28 (-7.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
ECCGX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. ECCGX (42.2M). TRCLX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: TRCLX (1.49) vs ECCGX (1.14). ECCGX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: ECCGX (32 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). ECCGX (2.71) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). TRCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.10 vs. ECCGX (48.00). ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: ECCGX (1000) vs TRCLX (500000). TRCLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.04 vs. ECCGX (23.15). TRCLX return over 5 years is better than : -9.00 vs. ECCGX (-43.30).
| ECCGX | TRCLX | ECCGX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.03 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.73 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.313 | 10.035 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 66.9M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.49 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 50.04 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.13 | 28.71 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.30 | -9.00 | 481% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement