Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MICHX
ECCGX vs MICHX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MICHX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.01
Change-$1.28 (-7.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
Matthews China Small Companies Instl
Price$12.83
Change+$0.65 (+5.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.17M
ECCGX vs MICHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MICHX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and MICHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MICHX has more cash in the bank: 72.2M vs. ECCGX (42.2M). MICHX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MICHX (2.20) vs ECCGX (1.14). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MICHX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MICHX (8 years). ECCGX (2.71) is less costly to investors than MICHX (1.50). MICHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.39 vs. ECCGX (48.00). ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MICHX: ECCGX (1000) vs MICHX (100000). MICHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.61 vs. ECCGX (23.15). MICHX return over 5 years is better than : -36.41 vs. ECCGX (-43.30).
| ECCGX | MICHX | ECCGX / MICHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.20 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 1.50 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.313 | 12.347 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 72.2M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 42.61 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.13 | 11.09 | -73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.30 | -36.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement