Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$17.14
Change-$0.08 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$15.54
Change-$0.06 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.35M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 99.3M vs. ECCGX (43.7M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (2.84) vs ECCGX (1.03). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.60 vs. MCDFX (35.61). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.67 vs. ECCGX (-36.25).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.868 | 34.330 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.7M | 99.3M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 2.84 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.60 | 35.61 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.81 | 35.27 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.25 | -2.67 | 1,358% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.58 | 42.14 | -25% |