Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.87
Change+$0.11 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.7M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 97.7M vs. ECCGX (42.4M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (2.83) vs ECCGX (1.05). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). MCDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.80 vs. ECCGX (48.00). ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). MCDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.35 vs. ECCGX (24.39). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.14 vs. ECCGX (-35.51).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.736 | 28.538 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 97.7M | 43% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 2.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.39 | 27.35 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.52 | 16.44 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.51 | -8.14 | 436% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.32 | 40.04 | -23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement