Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs MCDFX
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs MCDFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Matthews China Dividend Investor
Price$14.91
Change-$0.10 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.71M
ECCGX vs MCDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. MCDFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and MCDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCDFX has more cash in the bank: 104M vs. ECCGX (45.5M). MCDFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: MCDFX (2.78) vs ECCGX (0.99). ECCGX was incepted earlier than MCDFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs MCDFX (16 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than MCDFX (1.32). ECCGX (77.00) and MCDFX (75.80) have comparable annual turnover. ECCGX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCDFX: ECCGX (1000) vs MCDFX (2500). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.38 vs. MCDFX (27.74). MCDFX return over 5 years is better than : -3.89 vs. ECCGX (-32.74).
| ECCGX | MCDFX | ECCGX / MCDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.32 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.32 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.155 | 28.884 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 104M | 44% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 2.78 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.38 | 27.74 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 36.75 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.74 | -3.89 | 841% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.91 | 36.67 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement