Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FIQFX
ECCGX vs FIQFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FIQFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$54.32
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
ECCGX vs FIQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FIQFX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FIQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. ECCGX (45.5M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FIQFX (1.12) vs ECCGX (0.99). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FIQFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FIQFX (7 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FIQFX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FIQFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.37 vs. ECCGX (32.38). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.45 vs. ECCGX (-32.74).
| ECCGX | FIQFX | ECCGX / FIQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.77 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.77 | 348% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.155 | 41.749 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 1.12 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.38 | 35.37 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 105.19 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.74 | 12.45 | -263% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement