Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FIQFX
ECCGX vs FIQFX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FIQFX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$15.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity Advisor China Region Z
Price$47.70
Change-$0.31 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
ECCGX vs FIQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FIQFX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FIQFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIQFX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. ECCGX (41.1M). FIQFX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FIQFX (1.32) vs ECCGX (1.13). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FIQFX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FIQFX (7 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FIQFX (0.77). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FIQFX (30.00). FIQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FIQFX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.93 vs. FIQFX (30.39). FIQFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.79 vs. ECCGX (-35.00).
| ECCGX | FIQFX | ECCGX / FIQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.77 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.77 | 348% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.558 | 24.572 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.32 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.93 | 30.39 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.81 | 53.02 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.00 | 5.79 | -605% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.33 | N/A | - |