Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKTX
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.74
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$49.75
Change+$0.63 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ECCGX (42.6M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: ECCGX (1.07) vs FHKTX (0.88). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKTX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKTX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.88 vs. FHKTX (43.50). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.89 vs. ECCGX (-30.52).
| ECCGX | FHKTX | ECCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.43 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.43 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.767 | 29.093 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.88 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.88 | 43.50 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.79 | 58.39 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | 5.89 | -518% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.67 | 88.80 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement