Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKTX
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKTX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.43
Change-$0.13 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$52.79
Change-$0.12 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
ECCGX vs FHKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKTX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. ECCGX (42.4M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKTX: ECCGX (1.05) vs FHKTX (0.80). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKTX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKTX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKTX (1.43). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKTX (30.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKTX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.28 vs. ECCGX (33.96). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.77 vs. ECCGX (-39.43).
| ECCGX | FHKTX | ECCGX / FHKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.43 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.43 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.147 | 39.028 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.80 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.96 | 38.28 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.07 | 67.60 | 0% |
| Returns for 5 years | -39.43 | -1.77 | 2,227% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.40 | 112.80 | -13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement