Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.74
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$50.63
Change+$0.65 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ECCGX (42.6M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKIX (1.15) vs ECCGX (1.07). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.88 vs. FHKIX (44.24). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.07 vs. ECCGX (-30.52).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.90 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.90 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.767 | 29.549 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.88 | 44.24 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.79 | 61.00 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | 9.07 | -336% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.67 | 94.39 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers