Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.01
Change-$1.28 (-7.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.16M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$59.90
Change+$3.99 (+7.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.07B
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 2.07B vs. ECCGX (42.2M). FHKIX pays higher dividends than ECCGX: FHKIX (1.66) vs ECCGX (1.14). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). ECCGX (2.71) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.89). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (34.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (250) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.97 vs. ECCGX (23.15). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. ECCGX (-43.30).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 0.89 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.71 | 0.89 | 304% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.313 | 10.905 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.2M | 2.07B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.66 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.15 | 56.97 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.13 | 72.20 | -11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -43.30 | 2.08 | -2,086% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.48 | 207.86 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement