Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKIX
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKIX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.10
Change-$0.03 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$53.74
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
ECCGX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKIX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. ECCGX (42.4M). ECCGX (1.05) and FHKIX (1.04) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKIX (30.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKIX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.29 vs. ECCGX (23.56). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 5.78 vs. ECCGX (-35.98).
| ECCGX | FHKIX | ECCGX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.90 | 251% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.90 | 298% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.806 | 39.295 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.56 | 36.29 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.35 | 72.55 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.98 | 5.78 | -623% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.43 | 120.10 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement