Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.74
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity China Region
Price$51.03
Change+$0.65 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ECCGX (42.6M). FHKCX (1.11) and ECCGX (1.07) have matching dividends . ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.88 vs. FHKCX (44.21). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. ECCGX (-30.52).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.767 | 29.545 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.11 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.88 | 44.21 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.79 | 60.98 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | 9.19 | -332% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.67 | 94.89 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers