Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKCX
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKCX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity China Region
Price$54.60
Change+$0.39 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
ECCGX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. ECCGX (42.4M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ECCGX (1.05) vs FHKCX (1.00). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKCX (30 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKCX (30.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKCX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.41 vs. ECCGX (23.56). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.92 vs. ECCGX (-35.98).
| ECCGX | FHKCX | ECCGX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 0.91 | 248% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 0.91 | 295% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.806 | 39.393 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.00 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.56 | 36.41 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.35 | 72.63 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.98 | 5.92 | -608% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.43 | 120.51 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement