Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.74
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.61M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$50.24
Change+$0.64 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.38B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Sep 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.39B vs. ECCGX (42.6M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (1.07) vs FHKAX (0.97). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.88 vs. FHKAX (43.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.42 vs. ECCGX (-30.52).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.767 | 29.301 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.6M | 1.39B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.97 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 53.88 | 43.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.79 | 59.62 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.52 | 7.42 | -412% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.67 | 91.40 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement