Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.79
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.5M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.89
Change-$0.31 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Hold and FHKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. ECCGX (45.5M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (0.99) vs FHKAX (0.86). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.83 vs. ECCGX (32.38). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. ECCGX (-32.74).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.155 | 41.293 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.5M | 1.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.86 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.38 | 34.83 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.73 | 102.61 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.74 | 9.51 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.91 | 89.42 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement