Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$15.87
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.09M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$46.98
Change-$0.38 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. ECCGX (41.1M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (1.13) vs FHKAX (1.02). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (17 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). ECCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.93 vs. FHKAX (29.86). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. ECCGX (-35.00).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.558 | 24.244 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 1.31B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.02 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.93 | 29.86 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.81 | 51.07 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.00 | 3.00 | -1,167% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.33 | 82.16 | -15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement