Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECCGX vs FHKAX
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ECCGX vs FHKAX
Eaton Vance China Equity C
Price$16.22
Change+$0.12 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region A
Price$53.80
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
ECCGX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECCGX vs. FHKAX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECCGX is a Buy and FHKAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 1.74B vs. ECCGX (42.4M). ECCGX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ECCGX (1.05) vs FHKAX (0.88). ECCGX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ECCGX (32 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). ECCGX (2.68) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.18). ECCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FHKAX (30.00). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECCGX: FHKAX (0) vs ECCGX (1000). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.25 vs. ECCGX (23.56). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.43 vs. ECCGX (-35.98).
| ECCGX | FHKAX | ECCGX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.26 | 1.18 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.68 | 1.18 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.806 | 39.234 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4M | 1.74B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 0.88 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.56 | 36.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.35 | 71.45 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.98 | 4.43 | -812% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.43 | 116.67 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement