Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECAT vs ONOF
ECAT vs ONOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECAT vs. ONOF commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECAT is a Hold and ONOF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ECAT has more net assets: 1.63B vs. ONOF (145M). ECAT has a higher annual dividend yield than ONOF: ECAT (17.002) vs ONOF (5.981). ECAT was incepted earlier than ONOF: ECAT (4 years) vs ONOF (5 years). ONOF (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than ECAT (1.30). ONOF has a higher turnover ECAT (227.00) vs ECAT (227.00).
| ECAT | ONOF | ECAT / ONOF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.002 | 5.981 | 284% |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 145M | 1,126% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.39 | 333% |
| Turnover | 227.00 | 241.46 | 94% |
| Yield | 1.77 | 1.08 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ECAT | ONOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 84% | 17 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ECAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECAT has been loosely correlated with BSX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECAT jumps, then BSX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAT | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| BSX - ECAT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| CRM - ECAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| AMT - ECAT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| NEE - ECAT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| MSFT - ECAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||
ONOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ONOF has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ONOF jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ONOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONOF | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| MSFT - ONOF | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| META - ONOF | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| AMZN - ONOF | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AAPL - ONOF | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| NVDA - ONOF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
More | ||||