Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$26.47
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.62B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$104.68
Change-$0.06 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.9B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. ECASX (12.6B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.60) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.07 vs. ECASX (-16.18). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : -3.53 vs. TRQZX (-3.92).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.433 | 3.932 | -164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 25.9B | 49% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.18 | -8.07 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.85 | 12.66 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.53 | -3.92 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers