Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.03
Change-$2.53 (-9.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.37B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. ECASX (11.4B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.74) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.09 vs. ECASX (-15.95). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. ECASX (-18.87).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.166 | -0.061 | 272% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 25.1B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.95 | -5.09 | 313% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.43 | 2.38 | -313% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.87 | -13.86 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers