Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs TRQZX
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs TRQZX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$99.75
Change+$0.15 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
ECASX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ECASX (12.2B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than ECASX: TRQZX (0.60) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: ECASX (16 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ECASX: TRQZX (0) vs ECASX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.83 vs. ECASX (-14.77). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -10.65 vs. ECASX (-15.60).
| ECASX | TRQZX | ECASX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.61 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.538 | -0.963 | 1,406% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.77 | -2.83 | 521% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | 13.18 | 10% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -10.65 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers