Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$85.79
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ECASX (12.2B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.37 vs. ECASX (-14.77). ECASX return over 5 years is better than : -15.60 vs. RRMGX (-18.01).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.538 | -2.423 | 559% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.77 | -4.37 | 338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | 7.21 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -18.01 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.42 | 21.45 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers