Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RRMGX
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RRMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$26.38
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.18B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth R
Price$89.70
Change+$0.25 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
ECASX vs RRMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RRMGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RRMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. ECASX (13.2B). ECASX (0.00) and RRMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RRMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RRMGX (23 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RRMGX (1.29). RRMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RRMGX (2500). RRMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -9.04 vs. ECASX (-15.20). RRMGX return over 5 years is better than : -9.37 vs. ECASX (-9.97).
| ECASX | RRMGX | ECASX / RRMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.29 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.752 | 2.025 | -333% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 26.1B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.20 | -9.04 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.19 | 14.94 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.97 | -9.37 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.47 | 18.28 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers