Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RPTIX
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPTIX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth I
Price$99.02
Change+$0.15 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
ECASX vs RPTIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPTIX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and RPTIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPTIX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ECASX (12.2B). RPTIX pays higher dividends than ECASX: RPTIX (0.05) vs ECASX (0.00). ECASX was incepted earlier than RPTIX: ECASX (16 years) vs RPTIX (10 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RPTIX (0.63). RPTIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPTIX: ECASX (1000) vs RPTIX (500000). RPTIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.89 vs. ECASX (-14.77). RPTIX return over 5 years is better than : -12.51 vs. ECASX (-15.60).
| ECASX | RPTIX | ECASX / RPTIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.63 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.538 | -1.020 | 1,328% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.77 | -2.89 | 511% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | 11.59 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -12.51 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.42 | 35.77 | 21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers