Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs RPMGX
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs RPMGX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$26.38
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.18B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$102.19
Change+$0.29 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
ECASX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. RPMGX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and RPMGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. ECASX (13.2B). ECASX (0.00) and RPMGX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: ECASX (16 years) vs RPMGX (33 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RPMGX (0.75). RPMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: ECASX (1000) vs RPMGX (2500). RPMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.46 vs. ECASX (-15.20). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : -4.20 vs. ECASX (-9.97).
| ECASX | RPMGX | ECASX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.75 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.75 | 249% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.752 | 2.467 | -274% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 26.1B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.20 | -7.46 | 204% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.19 | 18.94 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.97 | -4.20 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.47 | 28.78 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement