Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs PAMCX
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$24.46
Change+$0.06 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$92.36
Change+$0.13 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ECASX (12.2B). ECASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ECASX (16 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: ECASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.57 vs. ECASX (-14.77). PAMCX (-15.24) and ECASX (-15.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ECASX | PAMCX | ECASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.538 | -1.703 | 795% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.77 | -3.57 | 414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | 9.16 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.60 | -15.24 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.42 | 28.90 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers