Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ECASX vs PAMCX
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ECASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap C
Price$26.38
Change+$0.15 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.18B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
ECASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ECASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECASX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. ECASX (13.2B). ECASX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ECASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ECASX (16 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). ECASX (1.87) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ECASX (9.00). ECASX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: ECASX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.20 vs. ECASX (-15.20). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -6.56 vs. ECASX (-9.97).
| ECASX | PAMCX | ECASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.01 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.752 | 2.256 | -299% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 26.1B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.20 | -8.20 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.19 | 17.07 | 1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.97 | -6.56 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.47 | 23.83 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers