Advertisement
ECAOF vs EP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECAOF is a Hold and EP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ECAOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ECAOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ECAOF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ECAOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ECAOF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +13.13% price change this week, while EP (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +12.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.72%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Production (+0.17% weekly)The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| ECAOF | EP | ECAOF / EP | |
| Capitalization | 37.8M | 172M | 22% |
| EBITDA | -5.61M | -4.43M | 127% |
| Gain YTD | -5.231 | -33.289 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 59.6K | 42.8M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 6.1M | 1.08M | 565% |
| Total Debt | N/A | 12.7M | - |
ECAOF | EP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 82 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ECAOF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as EP (96). This means that ECAOF’s stock grew similarly to EP’s over the last 12 months.
EP's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ECAOF (100). This means that EP’s stock grew similarly to ECAOF’s over the last 12 months.
EP's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ECAOF (98). This means that EP’s stock grew similarly to ECAOF’s over the last 12 months.
ECAOF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as EP (60). This means that ECAOF’s stock grew similarly to EP’s over the last 12 months.
EP's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ECAOF (99). This means that EP’s stock grew significantly faster than ECAOF’s over the last 12 months.
| ECAOF | EP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 90% | 17 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 87% |
Advertisement
ECAOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ECAOF and BLMC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ECAOF and BLMC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECAOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECAOF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| BLMC - ECAOF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FRHLF - ECAOF | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.42% | ||
| EXCE - ECAOF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FECCF - ECAOF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| EP - ECAOF | -2% Poorly correlated | +7.42% | ||
More | ||||
EP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EP has been loosely correlated with EGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EP jumps, then EGY could also see price increases.