EC
Price
$10.01
Change
-$0.16 (-1.57%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YPF
Price
$37.24
Change
-$0.67 (-1.77%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
14.61B
111 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs YPF

Header iconEC vs YPF Comparison
Open Charts EC vs YPFBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$10.01
Change-$0.16 (-1.57%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization20.38B
YPF Sociedad Anonima
Price$37.24
Change-$0.67 (-1.77%)
Volume$1.68M
Capitalization14.61B
EC vs YPF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. YPF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Buy and YPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EC: $10.01 vs. YPF: $37.24)
Brand notoriety: EC: Not notable vs. YPF: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 110% vs. YPF: 51%
Market capitalization -- EC: $20.38B vs. YPF: $14.61B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $20.38B. YPF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $14.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $500.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $62.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than YPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YPF is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +3.52% price change this week, while YPF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

YPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+3.48% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($20.4B) has a higher market cap than YPF($14.6B). YPF has higher P/E ratio than EC: YPF (11.70) vs EC (6.85). EC YTD gains are higher at: 49.995 vs. YPF (-10.821). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.52T vs. YPF (4.34B). EC has more cash in the bank: 14.34T vs. YPF (1.01B). YPF has less debt than EC: YPF (10.6B) vs EC (120.26T). EC has higher revenues than YPF: EC (130.44T) vs YPF (19.2B).
ECYPFEC / YPF
Capitalization20.4B14.6B140%
EBITDA51.52T4.34B1,186,096%
Gain YTD49.995-10.821-462%
P/E Ratio6.8511.7059%
Revenue130.44T19.2B679,354%
Total Cash14.34T1.01B1,418,398%
Total Debt120.26T10.6B1,134,519%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs YPF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
YPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2126
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3931
SMR RATING
1..100
4467
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1069
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a35

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (11) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (65). This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (39). This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (44) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as YPF (67). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to YPF’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (41). This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (69). This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSDD51.042.90
+6.03%
GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF
FEDM58.760.29
+0.49%
FlexShares ESG&Clmt Dev Mkts ex-US Cr
QUS173.860.51
+0.29%
Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA StratFacs ETF
QCLR32.90-0.02
-0.06%
Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF
AEF6.84-0.05
-0.73%
abrdn Emerging Markets ex-China Fund Inc.

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
N/A
SHEL - EC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
E - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
SU - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
CVE - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
BP - EC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
More

YPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YPF has been closely correlated with TGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if YPF jumps, then TGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YPF
1D Price
Change %
YPF100%
+1.04%
TGS - YPF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
EC - YPF
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PBR - YPF
48%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
CRGY - YPF
47%
Loosely correlated
-5.88%
CVE - YPF
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
More