EC
Price
$11.42
Change
-$0.15 (-1.30%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:24 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.56B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YPF
Price
$34.55
Change
-$0.28 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
13.56B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs YPF

Header iconEC vs YPF Comparison
Open Charts EC vs YPFBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$11.42
Change-$0.15 (-1.30%)
Volume$300
Capitalization22.56B
YPF Sociedad Anonima
Price$34.55
Change-$0.28 (-0.80%)
Volume$2.12M
Capitalization13.56B
EC vs YPF Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. YPF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Hold and YPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (EC: $11.57 vs. YPF: $34.55)
Brand notoriety: EC: Not notable vs. YPF: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 155% vs. YPF: 140%
Market capitalization -- EC: $22.56B vs. YPF: $13.56B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $22.56B. YPF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $13.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $549.07B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • YPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than YPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YPF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • YPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the short-term than YPF.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +10.61% price change this week, while YPF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +5.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

YPF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+2.01% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($22.6B) has a higher market cap than YPF($13.6B). YPF has higher P/E ratio than EC: YPF (11.70) vs EC (8.69). EC YTD gains are higher at: 15.469 vs. YPF (-4.452). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.62T vs. YPF (4.35B). EC has more cash in the bank: 13.73T vs. YPF (1.02B). YPF has less debt than EC: YPF (11.2B) vs EC (114.27T). EC has higher revenues than YPF: EC (125.67T) vs YPF (18.5B).
ECYPFEC / YPF
Capitalization22.6B13.6B166%
EBITDA49.62T4.35B1,140,405%
Gain YTD15.469-4.452-347%
P/E Ratio8.6911.7074%
Revenue125.67T18.5B679,292%
Total Cash13.73T1.02B1,351,772%
Total Debt114.27T11.2B1,020,268%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs YPF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
YPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
279
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4338
SMR RATING
1..100
2092
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
978
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (19) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YPF (64). This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

YPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EC (43). This means that YPF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (20) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for YPF (92). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as YPF (49). This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to YPF’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for YPF (78). This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than YPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECYPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHLT28.320.31
+1.09%
American Beacon AHL Trend ETF
CLOI52.820.01
+0.02%
VanEck CLO ETF
OPTZ37.43N/A
N/A
Optimize Strategy Index ETF
SEIX23.41-0.01
-0.05%
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
MVLL19.48-0.89
-4.36%
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+2.03%
SHEL - EC
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
E - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
SU - EC
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
CRGY - EC
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
CVE - EC
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
More

YPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YPF has been closely correlated with TGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if YPF jumps, then TGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YPF
1D Price
Change %
YPF100%
-0.80%
TGS - YPF
88%
Closely correlated
-1.84%
EC - YPF
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
CRGY - YPF
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
CVE - YPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
PBR - YPF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
More