EC
Price
$10.01
Change
-$0.16 (-1.57%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
20.38B
109 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGS
Price
$30.04
Change
-$0.49 (-1.60%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.52B
116 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs TGS

Header iconEC vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts EC vs TGSBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$10.01
Change-$0.16 (-1.57%)
Volume$2.19M
Capitalization20.38B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$30.04
Change-$0.49 (-1.60%)
Volume$213.5K
Capitalization4.52B
EC vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. TGS commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Buy and TGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (EC: $10.01 vs. TGS: $30.04)
Brand notoriety: EC and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 110% vs. TGS: 35%
Market capitalization -- EC: $20.38B vs. TGS: $4.52B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $20.38B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $500.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $62.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the short-term than TGS.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +3.52% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was +2.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +3.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+3.48% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($20.4B) has a higher market cap than TGS($4.52B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than EC: TGS (18.11) vs EC (6.85). EC YTD gains are higher at: 47.635 vs. TGS (8.052). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.52T vs. TGS (674B). EC has more cash in the bank: 14.34T vs. TGS (676B). TGS has less debt than EC: TGS (674B) vs EC (120.26T). EC has higher revenues than TGS: EC (130.44T) vs TGS (1.21T).
ECTGSEC / TGS
Capitalization20.4B4.52B451%
EBITDA51.52T674B7,645%
Gain YTD47.6358.052592%
P/E Ratio6.8518.1138%
Revenue130.44T1.21T10,753%
Total Cash14.34T676B2,121%
Total Debt120.26T674B17,843%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
EC
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2216
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4020
SMR RATING
1..100
4454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2685

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (11) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (62) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry is in the same range as EC (40) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that TGS’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (44) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (54) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (41) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (72) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GCAL50.95-0.01
-0.03%
Goldman Sachs Dynamic CA Muncpl Inc ETF
RIGS23.16-0.07
-0.30%
RiverFront Strategic Income ETF
GVAL30.95-0.22
-0.71%
Cambria Global Value ETF
GOF13.10-0.10
-0.76%
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
RITA19.39-0.26
-1.33%
ETFB Green SRI REITs ETF

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
-1.57%
SHEL - EC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.64%
E - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
SU - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
CVE - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
BP - EC
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.00%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
+0.63%
YPF - TGS
87%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
EC - TGS
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CRGY - TGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.88%
PBR - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
-3.64%
CVE - TGS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More