EC
Price
$12.11
Change
-$0.30 (-2.42%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:38 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.55B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TGS
Price
$29.36
Change
-$1.03 (-3.39%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.58B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs TGS

Header iconEC vs TGS Comparison
Open Charts EC vs TGSBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$12.11
Change-$0.30 (-2.42%)
Volume$510
Capitalization24.55B
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA
Price$29.36
Change-$1.03 (-3.39%)
Volume$254
Capitalization4.58B
EC vs TGS Comparison Chart in %
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. TGS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Hold and TGS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (EC: $12.40 vs. TGS: $30.39)
Brand notoriety: EC and TGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 164% vs. TGS: 127%
Market capitalization -- EC: $24.55B vs. TGS: $4.58B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $24.55B. TGS’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $4.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $600.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $67.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • TGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EC is a better buy in the long-term than TGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EC and TGS are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -5.20% price change this week, while TGS (@Integrated Oil) price change was -9.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.

TGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-0.41% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EC($24.5B) has a higher market cap than TGS($4.58B). TGS has higher P/E ratio than EC: TGS (18.87) vs EC (9.26). EC YTD gains are higher at: 23.752 vs. TGS (-2.252). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 49.62T vs. TGS (744B). EC has more cash in the bank: 13.73T vs. TGS (875B). TGS has less debt than EC: TGS (786B) vs EC (114.27T). EC has higher revenues than TGS: EC (125.67T) vs TGS (1.3T).
ECTGSEC / TGS
Capitalization24.5B4.58B536%
EBITDA49.62T744B6,669%
Gain YTD23.752-2.252-1,055%
P/E Ratio9.2618.8749%
Revenue125.67T1.3T9,645%
Total Cash13.73T875B1,570%
Total Debt114.27T786B14,538%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs TGS: Fundamental Ratings
EC
TGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
244
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
123
SMR RATING
1..100
2251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (21) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGS (61) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (23) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (22) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (51) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as TGS (53) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to TGS’s over the last 12 months.

EC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for TGS (86) in the Oil Refining Or Marketing industry. This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than TGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECTGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ECNS34.640.22
+0.64%
iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
SOR49.350.24
+0.49%
Source Capital
IYRI48.80-0.01
-0.02%
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
AGRH26.23-0.02
-0.07%
iShares Interest Rt Hdg U.S. Aggt Bd ETF
AOA92.02-0.27
-0.29%
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allc ETF

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+0.73%
SHEL - EC
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
SU - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.52%
E - EC
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CRGY - EC
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
IMO - EC
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.93%
More

TGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGS has been closely correlated with YPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TGS jumps, then YPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGS
1D Price
Change %
TGS100%
-2.60%
YPF - TGS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
EC - TGS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
CRGY - TGS
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
PBR - TGS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.66%
CVE - TGS
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More