EC
Price
$8.91
Change
+$0.19 (+2.18%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
17.91B
85 days until earnings call
EIPAF
Price
$18.61
Change
+$0.27 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
52.83B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EC vs EIPAF

Header iconEC vs EIPAF Comparison
Open Charts EC vs EIPAFBanner chart's image
Ecopetrol SA
Price$8.91
Change+$0.19 (+2.18%)
Volume$2.09M
Capitalization17.91B
ENI S.p.A
Price$18.61
Change+$0.27 (+1.47%)
Volume$163
Capitalization52.83B
EC vs EIPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EC vs. EIPAF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EC is a Hold and EIPAF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EC: $8.91 vs. EIPAF: $18.61)
Brand notoriety: EC and EIPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EC: 89% vs. EIPAF: 18%
Market capitalization -- EC: $17.91B vs. EIPAF: $52.83B
EC [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $17.91B. EIPAF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $52.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $453.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $56.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEIPAF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • EIPAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the long-term than EC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EIPAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • EIPAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EIPAF is a better buy in the short-term than EC.

Price Growth

EC (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while EIPAF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +1.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

EC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+0.61% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EIPAF($52.8B) has a higher market cap than EC($17.9B). EIPAF has higher P/E ratio than EC: EIPAF (21.47) vs EC (6.53). EIPAF YTD gains are higher at: 41.413 vs. EC (31.412). EC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.13T vs. EIPAF (24.3B). EC has higher revenues than EIPAF: EC (133.39T) vs EIPAF (85.5B).
ECEIPAFEC / EIPAF
Capitalization17.9B52.8B34%
EBITDA39.13T24.3B161,021%
Gain YTD31.41241.41376%
P/E Ratio6.5321.4730%
Revenue133.39T85.5B156,015%
Total CashN/A16.6B-
Total DebtN/A34.9B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EC vs EIPAF: Fundamental Ratings
EC
EIPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5728
SMR RATING
1..100
1485
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1811
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EC's Valuation (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EIPAF (31) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew similarly to EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (57) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EC's SMR Rating (14) in the Integrated Oil industry is significantly better than the same rating for EIPAF (85) in the null industry. This means that EC’s stock grew significantly faster than EIPAF’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (55) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

EIPAF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as EC (18) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that EIPAF’s stock grew similarly to EC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ECEIPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EIPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABLG29.830.26
+0.89%
Abacus FCF International Leaders ETF
FLEE34.370.08
+0.23%
Franklin FTSE Europe ETF
CGBL33.91-0.12
-0.35%
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
EAD7.04-0.04
-0.56%
Allspring Income Opportunities Fund
IBOT47.32-0.41
-0.86%
VanEck Robotics ETF

EC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EC has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EC jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EC
1D Price
Change %
EC100%
+2.18%
SHEL - EC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
BP - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
CVE - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
E - EC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
SU - EC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More

EIPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EIPAF and EQNR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EIPAF and EQNR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EIPAF
1D Price
Change %
EIPAF100%
+1.47%
EQNR - EIPAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
EC - EIPAF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
GLPEF - EIPAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.16%
SLNG - EIPAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
E - EIPAF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More