Advertisement
EBYH vs FBSFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBYH is a Hold and FBSFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBYH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFBSFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EBYH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FBSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBYH’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EBYH’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
EBYH (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FBSFF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.37%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +86.41%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (-2.00% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
@Packaged Software (-1.69% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| EBYH | FBSFF | EBYH / FBSFF | |
| Capitalization | 2.35M | 202M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -461.74K | 21.6M | -2% |
| Gain YTD | -17.671 | 15.311 | -115% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 18.35 | - |
| Revenue | 1.38K | 87.6M | 0% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 32.3M | - |
| Total Debt | 38K | 5.88M | 1% |
EBYH | FBSFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 43 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 85 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FBSFF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBYH (88). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBYH’s over the last 12 months.
FBSFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (100). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.
FBSFF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (100). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.
FBSFF's Price Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as EBYH (86). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew similarly to EBYH’s over the last 12 months.
FBSFF's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBYH (100). This means that FBSFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBYH’s over the last 12 months.
| EBYH | FBSFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 19% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
Advertisement
EBYH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EBYH and FBSFF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBYH and FBSFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBYH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBYH | 100% | N/A | ||
| FBSFF - EBYH | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MRT - EBYH | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.85% | ||
| LVWD - EBYH | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DGNOF - EBYH | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.51% | ||
| DNACF - EBYH | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FBSFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FBSFF and SWVL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBSFF and SWVL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBSFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBSFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SWVL - FBSFF | 32% Poorly correlated | +5.43% | ||
| EBYH - FBSFF | 30% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| OBLG - FBSFF | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.67% | ||
| EMCHF - FBSFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ELCO - FBSFF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||