EBTC
Price
$39.64
Change
-$0.30 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
318.88M
PFLC
Price
$10.90
Change
-$0.09 (-0.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
104.38M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBTC vs PFLC

Header iconEBTC vs PFLC Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs PFLCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$39.64
Change-$0.30 (-0.75%)
Volume$57.99K
Capitalization318.88M
Pacific Financial
Price$10.90
Change-$0.09 (-0.82%)
Volume$1.17K
Capitalization104.38M
EBTC vs PFLC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. PFLC commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a Buy and PFLC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (EBTC: $39.64 vs. PFLC: $10.90)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and PFLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 170% vs. PFLC: 35%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. PFLC: $104.38M
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. PFLC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $104.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePFLC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PFLC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EBTC and PFLC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFLC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PFLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PFLC is a better buy in the short-term than EBTC.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PFLC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.24% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBTC($319M) has a higher market cap than PFLC($104M). EBTC has higher P/E ratio than PFLC: EBTC (8.18) vs PFLC (6.67). EBTC YTD gains are higher at: 1.482 vs. PFLC (-10.219). EBTC has more cash in the bank: 45.3M vs. PFLC (16.6M). PFLC has less debt than EBTC: PFLC (13.4M) vs EBTC (110M). EBTC has higher revenues than PFLC: EBTC (171M) vs PFLC (55.4M).
EBTCPFLCEBTC / PFLC
Capitalization319M104M307%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.482-10.219-15%
P/E Ratio8.186.67123%
Revenue171M55.4M309%
Total Cash45.3M16.6M273%
Total Debt110M13.4M821%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs PFLC: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
PFLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
298
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4123
SMR RATING
1..100
2350
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1618
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PFLC's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBTC (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

PFLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is in the same range as EBTC (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that PFLC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFLC (50) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFLC (54) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PFLC (18) in the null industry. This means that EBTC’s stock grew similarly to PFLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTCPFLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PFLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME24.200.92
+3.95%
GameStop Corp
AAPL212.481.30
+0.62%
Apple
SPY628.771.19
+0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X117439.540000138.757810
+0.12%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA328.49-1.16
-0.35%
Tesla

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with EQBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then EQBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
N/A
EQBK - EBTC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
HWC - EBTC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
FFBC - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
NBTB - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
UBSI - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More

PFLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PFLC and BPIRY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PFLC and BPIRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFLC
1D Price
Change %
PFLC100%
-0.82%
BPIRY - PFLC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
SHG - PFLC
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
VABK - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
COFS - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
EBTC - PFLC
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More