EBTC
Price
$39.64
Change
-$0.30 (-0.75%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
318.88M
FFBC
Price
$24.62
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Jul 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.08B
2 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBTC vs FFBC

Header iconEBTC vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts EBTC vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Enterprise Ban
Price$39.64
Change-$0.30 (-0.75%)
Volume$57.99K
Capitalization318.88M
First Financial Ban
Price$24.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$14.35K
Capitalization2.08B
EBTC vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBTC vs. FFBC commentary
Jul 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBTC is a Buy and FFBC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 23, 2025
Stock price -- (EBTC: $39.64 vs. FFBC: $24.59)
Brand notoriety: EBTC and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBTC: 170% vs. FFBC: 97%
Market capitalization -- EBTC: $318.88M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
EBTC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $318.88M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBTC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EBTC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBTC is a better buy in the long-term than FFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBTC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBTC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBTC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

EBTC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than EBTC($319M). EBTC (8.18) and FFBC (8.15) have similar P/E ratio . EBTC YTD gains are higher at: 1.482 vs. FFBC (-6.785). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. EBTC (45.3M). EBTC has less debt than FFBC: EBTC (110M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than EBTC: FFBC (840M) vs EBTC (171M).
EBTCFFBCEBTC / FFBC
Capitalization319M2.08B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.482-6.785-22%
P/E Ratio8.188.15100%
Revenue171M840M20%
Total Cash45.3M213M21%
Total Debt110M1.28B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBTC vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
EBTC
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
296
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4123
SMR RATING
1..100
2312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5096
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (71). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (41). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBTC (23). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to EBTC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBC (96). This means that EBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

EBTC's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBC (55). This means that EBTC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTCFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBTC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEAIX55.640.20
+0.36%
Needham Aggressive Growth Institutional
AIECX19.510.03
+0.15%
Invesco EQV International Equity C
SMVIX21.90-0.02
-0.09%
SEI Small Cap Value I (SIMT)
PRFDX36.58-0.06
-0.16%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income
STRLX59.36-0.44
-0.74%
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val A

EBTC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBTC has been closely correlated with EQBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBTC jumps, then EQBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBTC
1D Price
Change %
EBTC100%
N/A
EQBK - EBTC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
HWC - EBTC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
FFBC - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
NBTB - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
UBSI - EBTC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.09%
ABCB - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
CBU - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
UBSI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
HOPE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
BANR - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More