Advertisement
EBS vs ZOMDF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBS is a Hold and ZOMDF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZOMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- ZOMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZOMDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- ZOMDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -5.56% price change this week, while ZOMDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -11.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -1.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.98%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
EBS is expected to report earnings on Mar 10, 2026.
ZOMDF is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-1.83% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
@Medical/Nursing Services (-2.76% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| EBS | ZOMDF | EBS / ZOMDF | |
| Capitalization | 606M | 120M | 505% |
| EBITDA | 264M | -35.94M | -735% |
| Gain YTD | -6.634 | 20.098 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 8.74 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 751M | 29.5M | 2,546% |
| Total Cash | 246M | 53.1M | 463% |
| Total Debt | 663M | 2.35M | 28,177% |
EBS | ZOMDF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 87 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ZOMDF's Valuation (38) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EBS (61) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
ZOMDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EBS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's SMR Rating (57) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZOMDF (97) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZOMDF’s over the last 12 months.
ZOMDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as EBS (43) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that ZOMDF’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for ZOMDF (100) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew significantly faster than ZOMDF’s over the last 12 months.
| EBS | ZOMDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 22 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
EBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBS has been loosely correlated with SIGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBS jumps, then SIGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBS | 100% | -1.45% | ||
| SIGA - EBS | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| VTRS - EBS | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ELAN - EBS | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.62% | ||
| PAHC - EBS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| COLL - EBS | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||
ZOMDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZOMDF has been loosely correlated with SNDL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZOMDF jumps, then SNDL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZOMDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZOMDF | 100% | -6.22% | ||
| SNDL - ZOMDF | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.92% | ||
| CDNA - ZOMDF | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| EBS - ZOMDF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
| ARAY - ZOMDF | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.20% | ||
| BNR - ZOMDF | 28% Poorly correlated | -15.00% | ||
More | ||||