It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINDV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INDV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -15.73% price change this week, while INDV (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -6.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
EBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
INDV is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
EBS | INDV | EBS / INDV | |
Capitalization | 120M | 2.91B | 4% |
EBITDA | -518.2M | 66M | -785% |
Gain YTD | 286.250 | -33.530 | -854% |
P/E Ratio | 17.73 | 2102.00 | 1% |
Revenue | 1.02B | 1.09B | 94% |
Total Cash | 112M | 410M | 27% |
Total Debt | 860M | 282M | 305% |
EBS | INDV | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 100 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBS's Valuation (63) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INDV (100) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBS (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that INDV’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBS’s over the last 12 months.
INDV's SMR Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that INDV’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as INDV (59) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to INDV’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Biotechnology industry is significantly better than the same rating for INDV (100) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew significantly faster than INDV’s over the last 12 months.
EBS | INDV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago62% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago76% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago79% | 9 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 3 days ago75% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBS has been loosely correlated with HKMPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBS jumps, then HKMPF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBS | 100% | -7.02% | ||
HKMPF - EBS | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
AMRX - EBS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
ZTS - EBS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
VTRS - EBS | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
SUPN - EBS | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that INDV and EBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INDV and EBS's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INDV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INDV | 100% | N/A | ||
EBS - INDV | 28% Poorly correlated | -7.02% | ||
OPTN - INDV | 24% Poorly correlated | -10.29% | ||
TEVA - INDV | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.12% | ||
GBHPF - INDV | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CTLT - INDV | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
More |