EBS vs EVO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBS is a Hold and EVO is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEVO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- EBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- EVO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EVO’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- EVO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EBS (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а -15.73% price change this week, while EVO (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +20.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +56.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
Reported Earning Dates
EBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
EVO is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+56.20% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| EBS | EVO | EBS / EVO | |
| Capitalization | 120M | 2.77B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -518.2M | -63.26M | 819% |
| Gain YTD | 286.250 | -56.522 | -506% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.73 | 476.19 | 4% |
| Revenue | 1.02B | 821M | 125% |
| Total Cash | 112M | 619M | 18% |
| Total Debt | 860M | 589M | 146% |
EBS | EVO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBS's Valuation (63) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EVO (98) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than EVO’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EVO (100) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
EVO's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (98) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
EBS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as EVO (39) in the null industry. This means that EBS’s stock grew similarly to EVO’s over the last 12 months.
EVO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as EBS (16) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that EVO’s stock grew similarly to EBS’s over the last 12 months.
| EBS | EVO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 63% |
EBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBS has been loosely correlated with HKMPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBS jumps, then HKMPF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBS | 100% | -7.02% | ||
| HKMPF - EBS | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMRX - EBS | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ZTS - EBS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
| VTRS - EBS | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
| SUPN - EBS | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.21% | ||
More | ||||
EVO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EVO and ESPR have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EVO and ESPR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EVO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVO | 100% | +12.09% | ||
| ESPR - EVO | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.83% | ||
| EBS - EVO | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.02% | ||
| ASRT - EVO | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.88% | ||
| COLL - EVO | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| ZTS - EVO | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
More | ||||