EBMT
Price
$18.02
Change
-$0.05 (-0.28%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
102.37M
65 days until earnings call
SBCF
Price
$28.17
Change
-$0.97 (-3.33%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.1B
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EBMT vs SBCF

Header iconEBMT vs SBCF Comparison
Open Charts EBMT vs SBCFBanner chart's image
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$18.02
Change-$0.05 (-0.28%)
Volume$26.53K
Capitalization102.37M
Seacoast Banking
Price$28.17
Change-$0.97 (-3.33%)
Volume$371.17K
Capitalization2.1B
EBMT vs SBCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. SBCF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a Buy and SBCF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EBMT: $17.61 vs. SBCF: $29.43)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and SBCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 101% vs. SBCF: 82%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $102.37M vs. SBCF: $2.1B
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $102.37M. SBCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the long-term than SBCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SBCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the short-term than SBCF.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +15.74% price change this week, while SBCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

SBCF is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBCF($2.1B) has a higher market cap than EBMT($102M). SBCF has higher P/E ratio than EBMT: SBCF (20.13) vs EBMT (9.90). EBMT YTD gains are higher at: 18.594 vs. SBCF (2.325). SBCF has more cash in the bank: 168M vs. EBMT (19.7M). SBCF has less debt than EBMT: SBCF (156M) vs EBMT (235M). SBCF has higher revenues than EBMT: SBCF (567M) vs EBMT (83.3M).
EBMTSBCFEBMT / SBCF
Capitalization102M2.1B5%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.5942.325800%
P/E Ratio9.9020.1349%
Revenue83.3M567M15%
Total Cash19.7M168M12%
Total Debt235M156M151%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs SBCF: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
SBCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2519
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10083
SMR RATING
1..100
5213
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2151
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBCF (79). This means that EBMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (100). This means that SBCF’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

SBCF's SMR Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (52). This means that SBCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

EBMT's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (46). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

EBMT's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SBCF (51). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to SBCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTSBCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

EBMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been loosely correlated with SBCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then SBCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBMT
1D Price
Change %
EBMT100%
-0.28%
SBCF - EBMT
60%
Loosely correlated
-3.33%
BUSE - EBMT
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
VLY - EBMT
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
SFNC - EBMT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
UVSP - EBMT
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More

SBCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBCF has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SBCF jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBCF
1D Price
Change %
SBCF100%
-3.33%
ABCB - SBCF
91%
Closely correlated
-2.13%
WSFS - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-2.74%
SFNC - SBCF
90%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
UBSI - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
PPBI - SBCF
89%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
More