EBMT
Price
$17.50
Change
+$0.13 (+0.75%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
102.37M
23 days until earnings call
FNWB
Price
$8.13
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
149.01M
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBMT vs FNWB

Header iconEBMT vs FNWB Comparison
Open Charts EBMT vs FNWBBanner chart's image
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$17.50
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
Volume$51.13K
Capitalization102.37M
First Northwest Ban
Price$8.13
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$2.22K
Capitalization149.01M
EBMT vs FNWB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. FNWB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a Hold and FNWB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EBMT: $17.50 vs. FNWB: $8.13)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and FNWB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 73% vs. FNWB: 12%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $102.37M vs. FNWB: $149.01M
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $102.37M. FNWB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $149.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFNWB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FNWB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the long-term than FNWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNWB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNWB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EBMT and FNWB are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.68% price change this week, while FNWB (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

FNWB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWB($149M) has a higher market cap than EBMT($102M). FNWB has higher P/E ratio than EBMT: FNWB (60.69) vs EBMT (9.90). EBMT YTD gains are higher at: 16.104 vs. FNWB (-19.253). FNWB (20.6M) and EBMT (19.7M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . EBMT has less debt than FNWB: EBMT (235M) vs FNWB (321M). EBMT has higher revenues than FNWB: EBMT (83.3M) vs FNWB (65.5M).
EBMTFNWBEBMT / FNWB
Capitalization102M149M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.104-19.253-84%
P/E Ratio9.9060.6916%
Revenue83.3M65.5M127%
Total Cash19.7M20.6M96%
Total Debt235M321M73%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs FNWB: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
FNWB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
86100
SMR RATING
1..100
4789
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4682
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
502
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (32) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

EBMT's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNWB (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

EBMT's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

EBMT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNWB (82) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNWB’s over the last 12 months.

FNWB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FNWB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTFNWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCHDF3.730.23
+6.57%
Hochschild Mining PLC
ICPVF1.62N/A
N/A
Dyno Nobel Ltd
FCSUF0.12N/A
N/A
Focus Minerals Ltd.
DWAHY33.97-0.16
-0.47%
Daiwa House Industry Co. Ltd.
TCBPY0.28-0.06
-17.69%
TC BioPharm (Holdings) plc

EBMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been loosely correlated with PFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then PFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBMT
1D Price
Change %
EBMT100%
+0.75%
PFS - EBMT
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
STBA - EBMT
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
UBSI - EBMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
FMBH - EBMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
VLY - EBMT
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.43%
More

FNWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNWB has been loosely correlated with ISTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNWB jumps, then ISTR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNWB
1D Price
Change %
FNWB100%
-0.12%
ISTR - FNWB
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
INDB - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
AX - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
EBMT - FNWB
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
BKU - FNWB
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.14%
More