It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EBMT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EBMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNLC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while FNLC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.06%.
EBMT is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
FNLC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
EBMT | FNLC | EBMT / FNLC | |
Capitalization | 102M | 274M | 37% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 10.183 | 9.163 | 111% |
P/E Ratio | 9.90 | 9.17 | 108% |
Revenue | 83.3M | 80.6M | 103% |
Total Cash | 19.7M | 25.1M | 78% |
Total Debt | 235M | 20.1M | 1,169% |
EBMT | FNLC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EBMT's Valuation (21) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNLC (72). This means that EBMT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNLC’s over the last 12 months.
FNLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (86). This means that FNLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
FNLC's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EBMT (50). This means that FNLC’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (43). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNLC (28). This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FNLC’s over the last 12 months.
EBMT | FNLC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago50% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago67% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago39% | 1 day ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago53% | 5 days ago58% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago45% | 3 days ago54% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago61% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago53% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EBMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EBMT | 100% | -0.59% | ||
SHBI - EBMT | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
UBSI - EBMT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
CBAN - EBMT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
FNLC - EBMT | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
FHB - EBMT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNLC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNLC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FNLC | 100% | +1.08% | ||
NWBI - FNLC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
GSBC - FNLC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
MBWM - FNLC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
UVSP - FNLC | 79% Closely correlated | -0.03% | ||
IBOC - FNLC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More |