EBMT
Price
$23.37
Change
+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
185.1M
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCAP
Price
$56.56
Change
-$6.94 (-10.93%)
Updated
Feb 5, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
212.57M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBMT vs FCAP

Header iconEBMT vs FCAP Comparison
Open Charts EBMT vs FCAPBanner chart's image
Eagle Bancorp Montana
Price$23.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.47%)
Volume$808
Capitalization185.1M
First Capital
Price$56.56
Change-$6.94 (-10.93%)
Volume$200
Capitalization212.57M
EBMT vs FCAP Comparison Chart in %
EBMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBMT vs. FCAP commentary
Feb 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBMT is a StrongBuy and FCAP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 06, 2026
Stock price -- (EBMT: $23.26 vs. FCAP: $63.50)
Brand notoriety: EBMT and FCAP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBMT: 255% vs. FCAP: 67%
Market capitalization -- EBMT: $185.1M vs. FCAP: $212.57M
EBMT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $185.1M. FCAP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $212.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $162.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBMT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFCAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBMT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FCAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EBMT and FCAP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBMT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EBMT is a better buy in the short-term than FCAP.

Price Growth

EBMT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.20% price change this week, while FCAP (@Regional Banks) price change was +27.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

EBMT is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.36% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCAP($213M) has a higher market cap than EBMT($185M). FCAP has higher P/E ratio than EBMT: FCAP (12.99) vs EBMT (12.24). EBMT YTD gains are higher at: 16.884 vs. FCAP (7.264). EBMT (21.4M) and FCAP (20.6M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FCAP has less debt than EBMT: FCAP (33.6M) vs EBMT (138M). EBMT has higher revenues than FCAP: EBMT (87.2M) vs FCAP (48.5M).
EBMTFCAPEBMT / FCAP
Capitalization185M213M87%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.8847.264232%
P/E Ratio12.2412.9994%
Revenue87.2M48.5M180%
Total Cash21.4M20.6M104%
Total Debt138M33.6M411%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBMT vs FCAP: Fundamental Ratings
EBMT
FCAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
224
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7673
SMR RATING
1..100
5451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5419
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBMT's Valuation (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (66) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that EBMT’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EBMT (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's SMR Rating (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EBMT (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as EBMT (39) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EBMT (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than EBMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBMTFCAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCAP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SURMF0.17N/A
+1.72%
SURFACE METALS INC.
MCRAB44.000.42
+0.96%
McRae Industries, Inc.
PGENY2.21N/A
N/A
Pigeon Corp.
PPKRF1.30N/A
N/A
Pepkor Holdings Ltd.
EQBBF32.00-2.30
-6.71%
EQT AB

EBMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EBMT has been closely correlated with PKBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EBMT jumps, then PKBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBMT
1D Price
Change %
EBMT100%
+1.33%
PKBK - EBMT
86%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
HTBK - EBMT
82%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
ATLO - EBMT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
CAC - EBMT
79%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
TRST - EBMT
79%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCAP has been closely correlated with PKBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCAP jumps, then PKBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
+3.32%
PKBK - FCAP
66%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
MOFG - FCAP
66%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
BCH - FCAP
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
EBMT - FCAP
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
BLFY - FCAP
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
More