EBKOF
Price
$104.54
Change
+$4.41 (+4.40%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
40.14B
SUTNY
Price
$5.90
Change
+$0.15 (+2.61%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
20.54B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EBKOF vs SUTNY

Header iconEBKOF vs SUTNY Comparison
Open Charts EBKOF vs SUTNYBanner chart's image
Erste Group Bank AG
Price$104.54
Change+$4.41 (+4.40%)
Volume$10.6K
Capitalization40.14B
Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group
Price$5.90
Change+$0.15 (+2.61%)
Volume$35.04K
Capitalization20.54B
EBKOF vs SUTNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EBKOF vs. SUTNY commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EBKOF is a StrongBuy and SUTNY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EBKOF: $104.54 vs. SUTNY: $5.90)
Brand notoriety: EBKOF and SUTNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EBKOF: 165% vs. SUTNY: 38%
Market capitalization -- EBKOF: $40.14B vs. SUTNY: $20.54B
EBKOF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $40.14B. SUTNY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $20.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EBKOF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUTNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EBKOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SUTNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EBKOF is a better buy in the long-term than SUTNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EBKOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUTNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EBKOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SUTNY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SUTNY is a better buy in the short-term than EBKOF.

Price Growth

EBKOF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.41% price change this week, while SUTNY (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.74% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EBKOF($40.1B) has a higher market cap than SUTNY($20.5B). EBKOF (12.09) and SUTNY (12.07) have similar P/E ratio . EBKOF YTD gains are higher at: 68.749 vs. SUTNY (25.457). EBKOF has less debt than SUTNY: EBKOF (55.5B) vs SUTNY (17.15T). SUTNY has higher revenues than EBKOF: SUTNY (1.23T) vs EBKOF (11B).
EBKOFSUTNYEBKOF / SUTNY
Capitalization40.1B20.5B196%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD68.74925.457270%
P/E Ratio12.0912.07100%
Revenue11B1.23T1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt55.5B17.15T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EBKOF vs SUTNY: Fundamental Ratings
EBKOF
SUTNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1210
SMR RATING
1..100
6100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1194
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EBKOF's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SUTNY (84). This means that EBKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

SUTNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as EBKOF (12). This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to EBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

EBKOF's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (100). This means that EBKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

EBKOF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SUTNY (44). This means that EBKOF’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

EBKOF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (94). This means that EBKOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBKOFSUTNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUTNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TENB29.790.69
+2.37%
Tenable Holdings
DXCM80.950.99
+1.24%
DexCom
GLSI12.170.09
+0.75%
Greenwich LifeSciences
TNGX6.77-0.15
-2.17%
Tango Therapeutics
BREA6.64-0.19
-2.74%
Brera Holdings PLC

EBKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EBKOF and BKRIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EBKOF and BKRIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EBKOF
1D Price
Change %
EBKOF100%
+4.40%
BKRIF - EBKOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
PDLB - EBKOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
SUTNY - EBKOF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
BNPQY - EBKOF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
SUPV - EBKOF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
More

SUTNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been loosely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUTNY
1D Price
Change %
SUTNY100%
+2.55%
MFG - SUTNY
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
DBSDY - SUTNY
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
CCRDF - SUTNY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWDBY - SUTNY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
ISNPY - SUTNY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
More