EB
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.08 (+3.05%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
552.13M
39 days until earnings call
TMSNY
Price
$73.06
Change
-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EB vs TMSNY

Header iconEB vs TMSNY Comparison
Open Charts EB vs TMSNYBanner chart's image
Eventbrite
Price$2.70
Change+$0.08 (+3.05%)
Volume$2.66M
Capitalization552.13M
Temenos AG
Price$73.06
Change-$0.18 (-0.25%)
Volume$1.73K
Capitalization6.18B
EB vs TMSNY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EB vs. TMSNY commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EB is a Buy and TMSNY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EB: $2.70 vs. TMSNY: $73.06)
Brand notoriety: EB and TMSNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EB: 391% vs. TMSNY: 25%
Market capitalization -- EB: $552.13M vs. TMSNY: $6.18B
EB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $552.13M. TMSNY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMSNY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMSNY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMSNY is a better buy in the long-term than EB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMSNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMSNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EB is a better buy in the short-term than TMSNY.

Price Growth

EB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.43% price change this week, while TMSNY (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

EB is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMSNY($6.18B) has a higher market cap than EB($552M). TMSNY YTD gains are higher at: 6.603 vs. EB (-19.643). TMSNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. EB (457K). EB has more cash in the bank: 643M vs. TMSNY (112M). EB has less debt than TMSNY: EB (361M) vs TMSNY (841M). TMSNY has higher revenues than EB: TMSNY (955M) vs EB (326M).
EBTMSNYEB / TMSNY
Capitalization552M6.18B9%
EBITDA457K311M0%
Gain YTD-19.6436.603-297%
P/E RatioN/A52.36-
Revenue326M955M34%
Total Cash643M112M574%
Total Debt361M841M43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EB vs TMSNY: Fundamental Ratings
EB
TMSNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3431
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9340
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMSNY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (32) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TMSNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TMSNY's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EB (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EB’s over the last 12 months.

EB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TMSNY (56) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to TMSNY’s over the last 12 months.

TMSNY's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMSNY’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTMSNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMSNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UBOT21.710.43
+2.02%
Direxion Dly Rbtc AI Atmtn Bl 2X ETF
GGME60.730.31
+0.51%
Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF
EIPI19.720.05
+0.26%
FT Energy Income Ptnrs Enh Inc ETF
CSHI49.760.05
+0.10%
NEOS Enhanced Income CA Alt ETF
VWOB65.07-0.04
-0.06%
Vanguard Emerging Mkts Govt Bd ETF

EB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EB has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EB jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EB
1D Price
Change %
EB100%
+3.05%
PUBM - EB
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
DV - EB
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
DH - EB
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
MITK - EB
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
DLO - EB
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

TMSNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMSNY has been loosely correlated with DAVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMSNY jumps, then DAVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMSNY
1D Price
Change %
TMSNY100%
-0.25%
DAVA - TMSNY
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SNOW - TMSNY
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
LPSN - TMSNY
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.14%
EVTC - TMSNY
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.75%
EB - TMSNY
36%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
More