EB
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.08 (+3.05%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
552.13M
39 days until earnings call
TMNSF
Price
$74.49
Change
-$1.14 (-1.51%)
Updated
Apr 22 closing price
Capitalization
6.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

EB vs TMNSF

Header iconEB vs TMNSF Comparison
Open Charts EB vs TMNSFBanner chart's image
Eventbrite
Price$2.70
Change+$0.08 (+3.05%)
Volume$2.66M
Capitalization552.13M
Temenos AG
Price$74.49
Change-$1.14 (-1.51%)
Volume$7
Capitalization6.18B
EB vs TMNSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EB vs. TMNSF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EB is a Buy and TMNSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EB: $2.70 vs. TMNSF: $74.49)
Brand notoriety: EB and TMNSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EB: 391% vs. TMNSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EB: $552.13M vs. TMNSF: $6.18B
EB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $552.13M. TMNSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $6.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTMNSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TMNSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TMNSF is a better buy in the long-term than EB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMNSF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TMNSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EB is a better buy in the short-term than TMNSF.

Price Growth

EB (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.43% price change this week, while TMNSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

EB is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMNSF($6.18B) has a higher market cap than EB($552M). TMNSF YTD gains are higher at: 4.807 vs. EB (-19.643). TMNSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 311M vs. EB (457K). EB has more cash in the bank: 643M vs. TMNSF (112M). EB has less debt than TMNSF: EB (361M) vs TMNSF (841M). TMNSF has higher revenues than EB: TMNSF (955M) vs EB (326M).
EBTMNSFEB / TMNSF
Capitalization552M6.18B9%
EBITDA457K311M0%
Gain YTD-19.6434.807-409%
P/E RatioN/A50.00-
Revenue326M955M34%
Total Cash643M112M574%
Total Debt361M841M43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EB vs TMNSF: Fundamental Ratings
EB
TMNSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3450
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9340
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMNSF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (32) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMNSF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TMNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMNSF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TMNSF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EB (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EB’s over the last 12 months.

EB's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TMNSF (56) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to TMNSF’s over the last 12 months.

TMNSF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TMNSF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBTMNSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMNSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIGUX20.890.08
+0.38%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income R6
VSORX44.540.02
+0.04%
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp R6
RBCIX9.96-0.03
-0.30%
RBC China Equity I
PHSRX48.51-0.15
-0.31%
Putnam Global Health Care R
EPIVX12.30-0.07
-0.57%
EuroPac International Value A

EB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EB has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EB jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EB
1D Price
Change %
EB100%
+3.05%
PUBM - EB
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
DV - EB
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
DH - EB
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
MITK - EB
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.10%
DLO - EB
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
More

TMNSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMNSF has been loosely correlated with EB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMNSF jumps, then EB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMNSF
1D Price
Change %
TMNSF100%
N/A
EB - TMNSF
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
PAYO - TMNSF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.79%
EVTC - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
IFBD - TMNSF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
VASO - TMNSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More