EB
Price
$2.62
Change
+$0.02 (+0.77%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
252.83M
81 days until earnings call
LQWDF
Price
$1.48
Change
+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
41.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EB vs LQWDF

Header iconEB vs LQWDF Comparison
Open Charts EB vs LQWDFBanner chart's image
Eventbrite
Price$2.62
Change+$0.02 (+0.77%)
Volume$983.96K
Capitalization252.83M
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES
Price$1.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.68%)
Volume$29.73K
Capitalization41.7M
EB vs LQWDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EB vs. LQWDF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EB is a Hold and LQWDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EB: $2.62 vs. LQWDF: $1.48)
Brand notoriety: EB and LQWDF are both not notable
EB represents the Internet Software/Services, while LQWDF is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EB: 130% vs. LQWDF: 10%
Market capitalization -- EB: $252.83M vs. LQWDF: $41.7M
EB [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $252.83M. LQWDF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $41.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.47T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $75.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLQWDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EB is a better buy in the long-term than LQWDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LQWDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LQWDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EB is a better buy in the short-term than LQWDF.

Price Growth

EB (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а +3.15% price change this week, while LQWDF (@Packaged Software) price change was -16.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.04%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

EB is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+2.51% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EB($253M) has a higher market cap than LQWDF($41.7M). LQWDF YTD gains are higher at: -0.671 vs. EB (-22.024). EB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.57M vs. LQWDF (-2.12M). EB has more cash in the bank: 503M vs. LQWDF (1.33M). EB has higher revenues than LQWDF: EB (313M) vs LQWDF (8.18K).
EBLQWDFEB / LQWDF
Capitalization253M41.7M607%
EBITDA7.57M-2.12M-358%
Gain YTD-22.024-0.6713,282%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue313M8.18K3,827,342%
Total Cash503M1.33M37,820%
Total Debt243MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EB vs LQWDF: Fundamental Ratings
EB
LQWDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1774
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EB's Valuation (37) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQWDF (94) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

EB's SMR Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (95) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (59) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to EB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBLQWDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLPTF0.09N/A
N/A
LIAONING PORT CO LTD.
PHGUF1.16N/A
N/A
Pharming Group NV
HZRGF0.27N/A
N/A
HAZER GROUP LTD.
PETFF1.26N/A
N/A
PTT Public Company Ltd.
BHLIF0.01N/A
N/A
Bradda Head Lithium Limited

EB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EB has been loosely correlated with PUBM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EB jumps, then PUBM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EB
1D Price
Change %
EB100%
+0.77%
PUBM - EB
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
DV - EB
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
NXDR - EB
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
DLO - EB
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.02%
DH - EB
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More

LQWDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQWDF and EVH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQWDF and EVH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQWDF
1D Price
Change %
LQWDF100%
+0.68%
EVH - LQWDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
XYZ - LQWDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
EB - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
QLYS - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
DCBO - LQWDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
More