EB
Price
$3.57
Change
-$0.04 (-1.11%)
Updated
Dec 18, 11:56 AM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
JAMF
Price
$15.22
Change
+$0.17 (+1.13%)
Updated
Dec 18, 01:27 PM (EDT)
76 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EB vs JAMF

Header iconEB vs JAMF Comparison
Open Charts EB vs JAMFBanner chart's image
Eventbrite
Price$3.57
Change-$0.04 (-1.11%)
Volume$2.28K
CapitalizationN/A
Jamf Holding
Price$15.22
Change+$0.17 (+1.13%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
EB vs JAMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EB vs. JAMF commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EB is a Hold and JAMF is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (EB: $3.61 vs. JAMF: $15.05)
Brand notoriety: EB and JAMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EB: 64% vs. JAMF: 105%
Market capitalization -- EB: $552.13M vs. JAMF: $2.31B
EB [@Packaged Software] is valued at $552.13M. JAMF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJAMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JAMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EB and JAMF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while JAMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • JAMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, JAMF is a better buy in the short-term than EB.

Price Growth

EB (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.25% price change this week, while JAMF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

EB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

JAMF is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.83% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JAMF($2.31B) has a higher market cap than EB($552M). JAMF YTD gains are higher at: -16.667 vs. EB (-56.818). EB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 457K vs. JAMF (-64.95M). EB has more cash in the bank: 643M vs. JAMF (244M). EB (361M) and JAMF (367M) have identical debt. JAMF has higher revenues than EB: JAMF (561M) vs EB (326M).
EBJAMFEB / JAMF
Capitalization552M2.31B24%
EBITDA457K-64.95M-1%
Gain YTD-56.818-16.667341%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue326M561M58%
Total Cash643M244M264%
Total Debt361M367M98%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EB vs JAMF: Fundamental Ratings
EB
JAMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7679
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6061
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EB's Valuation (26) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as JAMF (29) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

EB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as JAMF (100) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

EB's SMR Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as JAMF (94) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

EB's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as JAMF (61) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

EB's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as JAMF (100) in the null industry. This means that EB’s stock grew similarly to JAMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EBJAMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
JAMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

EB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EB has been loosely correlated with NRDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EB jumps, then NRDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EB
1D Price
Change %
EB100%
-1.10%
NRDY - EB
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.63%
PUBM - EB
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
BMBL - EB
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
JAMF - EB
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
MITK - EB
40%
Loosely correlated
+15.17%
More

JAMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JAMF has been loosely correlated with PD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if JAMF jumps, then PD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JAMF
1D Price
Change %
JAMF100%
+0.07%
PD - JAMF
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
SSNC - JAMF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
ONTF - JAMF
45%
Loosely correlated
-3.75%
ACIW - JAMF
45%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
ALKT - JAMF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
More